This is not a time of radical, revolutionary politics. Not yet. Unrest, riot, dissent, and chaos notwithstanding, today's politics is reactionary. Both Left and Right are reactionary and authoritarian. That is to say, both are political. They seek only to revise current methods of acquiring and wielding political power. Radical and revolutionary movements seek not to revise but to revoke. The target of revocation should be obvious. The target is politics itself.
Radicals and revolutionaries have had their sights trained on politics for some time. As governments fail around the world, as more millions become aware that government never has and never can humanely and effectively manage men's affairs, government's own inadequacy will emerge, at last, as the basis for a truly radical and revolutionary movement. In the meantime, the radical-revolutionary position is a lonely one. It is feared and hated, by both Right and Left — although both Right and Left must borrow from it to survive. The radical-revolutionary position is libertarianism, and its socioeconomic form is...
That was Karl Hesse writing forty years ago. Not much has changed then eh? He goes on to state that the socioeconomic form should be "laissez-faire capitalism" but every word that he's written up to that point could be read on any libertarian socialist site. Even within the libertarian movement, the political battle between right and left, between capitalism and socialism, continues unabated. They start off on good ground (the target is politics itself) and then get sucked right back into the old authoritarian modus vivendi of justifying political systems that are inherently authoritarian and tend to state-building. Is it just me who sees this as somewhat ironic?
Friday, 6 November 2009
The Death of Politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment